No. 23-5327
IFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process federal-jurisdiction free-speech judicial-review patent standing statutory-interpretation takings
Latest Conference:
2023-09-26
Question Presented (from Petition)
Question not identified.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the lower court erred in its application of the Alice test for patent eligibility under 35 USC 101
Docket Entries
2023-12-21
Case considered closed.
2023-10-02
The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. Petitioner is allowed until October 23, 2023, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
2023-08-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-06-06
Petition for writ of habeas corpus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed.
Attorneys
Titus Radcliff
Titus Lee Radcliff — Petitioner