No. 24-47
Return Mail, Inc. v. United States
Tags: 35-usc-101 abstract-idea alice-corporation-v-cls-bank innovation judicial-interpretation patent patent-eligibility patent-law return-mail-inc-v-united-states-postal-service section-101
Latest Conference:
2024-11-15
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the claimed invention is ineligible for patent protection under the abstract-idea exception to 35 U.S.C. §101.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the claimed invention is ineligible for patent protection under the abstract-idea exception to 35 U.S.C. §101
Docket Entries
2024-11-18
Petition DENIED.
2024-10-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/15/2024.
2024-10-25
Reply of petitioner Return Mail, Inc. filed. (Distributed)
2024-10-16
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2024-08-29
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including October 16, 2024.
2024-08-28
Motion of United States for an extension of time submitted.
2024-08-28
Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 16, 2024 to October 16, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
2024-07-23
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including September 16, 2024.
2024-07-22
Motion of United States for an extension of time submitted.
2024-07-22
Motion to extend the time to file a response from August 15, 2024 to September 16, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
2024-07-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 15, 2024)
2024-05-07
Application (23A988) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until July 12, 2024.
2024-05-02
Application (23A988) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from May 13, 2024 to July 12, 2024, submitted to The Chief Justice.
Attorneys
Return Mail, Inc.
Cameron Thomas Norris — Consovoy McCarthy PLLC, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent