Question Presented (from Petition)
(SIMULTANEDUS CONTTESTED CLAETM)
LABELED B)CASE 13-5186
WAS THIS
1-9-2OIS LETEL SUPPOSE TO BE THE AASWEL FROM THE FIFUG
PASD FEE FU WHIEH MY CASE WITS NOT DOCKETED
UNDEL fULE 35(3)?
ALONG WITH LETTER OF CASE# 1-9300 3/1S/2012 LABELEO(A)
PAUENG OF AN AOOSTONAL 3UO OO FILENG FEE WHICH NOW
ioIll
THE
TOTALS
$600.00
BE
USTP TO DOKET THE
STASULTANEOUS CONTESTEO CLATY
As 2 CASES
CASE
IN ONE WTTH ONE SIOE BEEANE REVDNED?
NOTE
REVAM WHIEL WAS NOT
PASO
DONE!!
FOR
FILINl UAIDER
A
WHM I' EXPASNTAG IS THUE, I SHOULDNT
TF
HAUE TO FIU OUT AL
AODITONM PAGES, IH THE CASE IS GOTAG TO BE REVIVED?
THE
:
1
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the lower court erred in dismissing the petitioner's claims
Docket Entries
2021-06-01
Rehearing DENIED.
2021-05-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/27/2021.
2021-04-21
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2021-04-19
Petition DENIED.
2021-03-31
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/16/2021.
2021-03-16
Petition for writ of habeas corpus filed.
Attorneys
Titus L. Radcliff
Titus Radcliff — Petitioner