No. 18-7435
James Arthur Biggins v. Carl C. Danberg, et al.
IFP
Tags: 35-usc-101 civil-procedure damages due-process jurisdiction patent patent-eligibility patent-infringement patent-law standing takings
Latest Conference:
2019-03-15
Question Presented (from Petition)
Question not identified.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the lower court erred in its interpretation and application of the relevant patent law statutes
Docket Entries
2019-03-18
Petition DENIED.
2019-02-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/15/2019.
2018-07-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 14, 2019)
2018-05-29
Application (17A1317) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until July 4, 2018.
2018-04-03
Application (17A1317) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from June 4, 2018 to July 4, 2018, submitted to Justice Alito.
Attorneys
James Biggins
James Arthur Biggins — Petitioner