Jose Luis Barboza, Jr. v. Texas
for a new judge in the trial do to the fact that there was no proff ot that Statment from defendant.
also defendant was charged in a dubble jeopardy do to the fact that there was an aledged brake in a aledged assault-how can that be with no evidenc of the viltum or defendant at the Store or any witness the aledged Store.
it 3 How is it that the State expert witness Mr.Wells from the gang intellegence Clearly. States that defendant Barboza is not proven member but Matt the State withess being to be a the the jury a Straight lie that they know District Attorney tells
6 Mr. Barboza does that get over looked on 1s the Petition for Discretionary livew?
being thr States witness, district attorney $Mrs. Peflen plainly with a bribery offers the jury of her Car keys to get the that she wanted how is this over looked in the State Sentence Prosccutes of Texas Misconduct?
) How is it that defendants charge Caries 2-20 years but with the habitual it Caries 2s-99 years or 1 life. The habitual sentencing is only in effect if the case is taken to trial that is Texas Paw.Well both offers were 2s yr thats out of sentencing offer guideliness and range. How is this over looked?
Whether the defendant was improperly called a 'n****r lover' by the victim's attorney, resulting in a violation of due-process, free-speech, civil-rights