No. 19-5937
Raymond Johnson v. Credit One Bank, et al.
IFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process equal-protection evidence-admissibility free-speech judicial-discretion patent standing takings trial-procedure
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity FifthAmendment DueProcess CriminalProcedure JusticiabilityDoctri
SocialSecurity FifthAmendment DueProcess CriminalProcedure JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2019-11-15
Question Presented (from Petition)
Did the trial court wrongfully deny Johnson's Fourth Amendment rights when the trial court failed to allow Johnson to present his motions to enforce Settlement Agreement against LUNV Resurgent Capital Services, and true Accord only Capital due process rights.
Did the trial court engage in weighing of the evidence when Johnson's trial court failed to admit any of admissible evidence in this case for an motions in an orchestrate effort to assist Opposing Counsel Ma. Patrick K. Burns who is of the Majority face in shunning a his underlying claims defense nnoty Resurgent Capital Services.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the lower court erred in dismissing the petitioner's claims
Docket Entries
2019-11-18
Petition DENIED.
2019-10-31
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/15/2019.
2019-07-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 15, 2019)
Attorneys
Raymond Johnson
Raymond Johnson — Petitioner