No. 19-6622
Helene Tonique Williams v. Toni Preckwinkle, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-review due-process federal-jurisdiction free-speech judicial-discretion patent procedural-dismissal standing state-court-procedure takings
Latest Conference:
2020-01-10
Question Presented (from Petition)
Helene Tonique Williams warld like to qustion, why the Dorthern District of Illinors Eastern son ned y conial t to livil action or file lawuts withs th Execantie Orderandse 1-58.A, in Helee TnigueWilin why ws the e isied oreing riles.Id io Hw both C6 18-V-8213and 19-2214 move to the Supreme cart of the United States!
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the District Court erred in dismissing the case against Pliner Porgue A Mhams, et al.
Docket Entries
2020-01-13
Petition DENIED.
2019-12-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.
2019-12-13
Waiver of right of respondent Toni Preckwinkle, et al. to respond filed.
2019-11-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 13, 2019)
Attorneys
Helene Tonique Williams
Helene Tonique Williams — Petitioner
Toni Preckwinkle, et al.
Paul Anthony Castiglione — Cook County State, Respondent