No. 21-6892

Jabari J. Johnson v. Janet Smith, et al.

Lower Court: Tenth Circuit
Docketed: 2022-01-18
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights due-process patent standing takings
Latest Conference: 2022-03-18
Question Presented (from Petition)

Their descietion rEIardiNg ISSUE / and ISSUp2

Or was the District folrt Clearly erroneons?

Couln have been takeh renndins Issue Iand??

3. Planlit, askthe Supreme Conrt wm Distret CoultICaurt Ot A Ppeals iludgmenl incorect in whih what grounds did the distrie Couvl Hall Ho Consider?

4. Plaintit ask the supreme Coyit I take actin Plaintills case by remandins the case back to Distriet Coirf?

5.The Plaintit alse re guiest an Oral Argument take plare in the intrest of clusticc.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Supreme Court should grant certiorari to review the District Court's dismissal of the petitioners' claims

Docket Entries

2022-03-21
Petition DENIED.
2022-03-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/18/2022.
2022-01-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 17, 2022)

Attorneys

Jabari Johnson
Jabari Johnson — Petitioner