Where all court filing fees have been paid to initiate pursuit, what is the appropriate inquiry for determining when only a litigant's factual allegations justify a dismissal of all claims under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and what is the proper standard of appellate review for such a dismissal?

Whether a complaint can survive a motion to dismiss when its factual allegations and claims involve one or more technologies, or capabilities of combined technologies, that are either in development or unfamiliar to a court but instead regarded by a court as nonexistent in lieu of it requiring evidence.

Whether, in an initiating complaint, are legally cognizable causes of action sufficient when conforming to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule Eight (8) and supported by factual allegations apart from legal theory or such other further detail creating a reasonable expectation that discovery may surface additional evidence of wrongdoing.

Did petitioner, as the plaintiff in the District Court, plead factual matter that, if taken as true, sufficiently alleges in support of federal causes of action or other remedies within the jurisdiction of federal courts?

Whether a complaint can survive a motion to dismiss when its factual allegations and claims involve one or more technologies, or capabilities of combined technologies, that are either in development or unfamiliar to a court but instead regarded by a court as nonexistent in lieu of it requiring evidence