No. 20-5982

Elmo Fortenberry v. Texas Board of Pardons and Parole, et al.

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-10-13
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights due-process patent standing takings
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw
Latest Conference: 2020-12-11
Question Presented (from Petition)

For which Relief Can Be granted.

IS Fraud A Tort When Donwilfully is FTA Crime.

Knoutrghy And inTenToNAly WillFolly iSAFdoNY: is Fraud Any FAlse STAtemont 'or evidence. USed TO enduer AnoTher TO MAte A BAd FATh OPenOW,

CAn PArole Be Time Bared in New haim By USe OF old Known FlAN

DOSe TiME START On STATUTE'OF LiMiTATiONS AT LAST illEQAL ACT

Dose Parole O FFicel have ABsolote immoniTY

Dose Pasole Board mombes have ABsoleT inmuntey

is There Aet willFoll y. Knoutey ly And intentisa USe OF FrAUd

A Dose liThmend STATe Thereis No immunity whinq Will Filly ViOlaTng Rights And LAW'S ACLUSOIS.

b TO AnGUo All ClAins And Brinq A DeFenct To CAch CLAtm And Aliqution. easted OF JUST Bir qAeq heoeOwn CLAim wiTh A FriViOlos DeFence.

IS ThIS A MiSCAVAGE OE JUSTICE By AlL Should hove The Courts And People Cooked AT All FillingS And Evideuce LETTer's, RequeSTicIGO's, end OF Queston's

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the lower court erred in its interpretation of the relevant constitutional and statutory provisions

Docket Entries

2020-12-14
Petition DENIED.
2020-11-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/11/2020.
2020-07-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 12, 2020)

Attorneys

Elmo Fortenberry
Elmo Fortenberry — Petitioner