No. 20-7267

Kevin L. Martin v. Cathleen Capron, et al.

Lower Court: Seventh Circuit
Docketed: 2021-03-01
Status: Dismissed
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 35-usc-112 court-of-appeals enablement invention patent prior-art
Latest Conference: 2021-04-01
Question Presented (from Petition)

whether thE couat of Arpeal
G-)
Follew
stventh circuit
oF
constitutional
1bf42ubpend u42ow
4420m Lo4310n Li29
2r6y
452
beFore
+yb2
te notice
A
deal with
document
femeve
attorney
Legat- mail Froon
incoming

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the court of appeals erred in finding that the claimed invention meets the enablement requirement of 35 U.S.C. § 112

Docket Entries

2021-04-05
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. Justice Barrett took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and this petition.
2021-03-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/1/2021.
2021-03-10
Waiver of right of respondent Cathleen Capron, et al. to respond filed.
2020-05-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 31, 2021)

Attorneys

Cathleen Capron, et al.
Aaron Thomas CraftOffice of the Indiana Attorney General, Respondent
Kevin Martin
Kevin L. Martin — Petitioner