Dwight L. Allen v. Superior Court of Georgia, Camden County
Securities
Deferdant to have his/herCase Rernoved to Federa/ Courtnnder
CertaiD extraordivary Cireumstarce the onsty hurdhe the Chamant
Must satisty is a Fso Prorg test thathas Becn Surmerized By the
Supkeme Court.
QunF or B d
to "unhantul" Dissmissals?
2.)9% one of the ma Resposibitity of the Federal Couts in beorgia
is to protect the Resifent's of borgia and Ctizens of the miitedstate
OF Ameri'ca agairest any Ercroachment of theiR Conistfutionally
Secured liberty's.
to"Coreal,"the"Corspiracy
"BetweeN State! Local bawmaters agasss
"Pook" Deterdant, By ReFusing to Follow the Ruke of Law awd the Legis.
Lative Intent Pertaring to Federa/ Statute 28u.3. C.$1443?
3.) he ClaimantFiedafederal Copkintistohe ied States pishi
Court For the Souther Pistict of beorgia, Bounswick, Diusron on
ane 18, 2o17, Challengidg the 3 Strikes hule", within'the Prson
Litigation Reform Aet." ChallerginghowFederal lonst's iN Beorgia
Hhe tederal sistict CountCompletely"Ignored this Complist
(no Response) So what Says the SukEnE lourt asont thi's CRIst'S"
.) The Chaimaut ask this prsdctona/auestior to the Se
PurSnastt
Whether the federal district court erred in dismissing the petitioner's claims