1. DUAL CONVICTIONS FOR FAILING TO MEET A MINOR FOR UNLAWFUL SEX AND SOLICITATION AND USE OF COMPUTER FOR CHILD EXPLOITATION AND UNLAWFUL USE OF A TWO-WAY COMMUNICATIONS DEVICE VIOLATE DOUBLE JEOPARDY PROTECTIONS ACQUITTAL WHEN THE UNDISPUTED EVIDENCE DEMONSTRATED ENTRAPMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW AND FACT.

2. THE COURT ERRED BY ALLOWING INADMISSIBLE UNCHARGED EVIDENCE WITHOUT DEFENSE.

3. THE COURT ERRED IN DENYING THE MOTION TO SUPPRESS IN THE ABSENCE OF PROBABLE CAUSE FOR THE INITIAL STOP AND APPREHENSION, THE SUBSEQUENT VEHICLE.

4. TRIAL COURT COMMITTED FUNDAMENTAL REVERSIBLE ERROR IN FAILING TO PROPERLY RESPOND TO THE JURY'S ENTRAPMENT QUESTION.

5. THE PROSECUTION'S CLOSING ARGUMENT WAS UNFAIRLY PREJUDICIAL AND ADVERSELY AFFECTED THE JURY VERDICT.

Whether the Second District Court of Appeals erred in dismissing the petitioner's case