No. 21-746
Apple Inc. v. Qualcomm Incorporated
Tags: article-iii civil-procedure civil-rights due-process inter-partes-review license-agreement patent patent-challenge patent-validity standing takings
Key Terms:
Antitrust Patent JusticiabilityDoctri
Antitrust Patent JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2022-06-23
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether a licensee has Article III standing to challenge the validity of a patent covered by a license agreement that covers multiple patents.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a licensee has Article III standing to challenge the validity of a patent covered by a license agreement that covers multiple patents
Docket Entries
2022-06-27
Petition DENIED.
2022-06-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/23/2022.
2022-06-06
Supplemental brief of petitioner Apple Inc. filed. (Distributed)
2022-05-24
Brief amicus curiae of United States filed.
2022-02-22
The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.
2022-02-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/18/2022.
2022-02-01
Reply of petitioner Apple Inc. filed. (Distributed)
2022-01-19
Brief of respondent Qualcomm Incorporated in opposition filed.
2021-12-20
Brief amicus curiae of Thales filed.
2021-12-20
Brief amicus curiae of Unified Patents, LLC filed.
2021-12-20
Brief amici curiae of Senator Patrick Leahy and Congressman Darrell Issa filed.
2021-12-17
Brief amici curiae of Engine Advocacy, et al. filed.
2021-12-03
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 19, 2022.
2021-12-02
Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 20, 2021 to January 19, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-11-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 20, 2021)
2021-09-09
Application (21A39) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until November 17, 2021.
2021-09-03
Application (21A39) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from October 18, 2021 to November 17, 2021, submitted to The Chief Justice.
Attorneys
Apple Inc.
Mark Christopher Fleming — WilmerHale, Petitioner
Engine Advocacy, The Public Interest Patent Law Institute, and ACT | The App Association
Qualcomm Incorporated
Aaron Michael Streett — Baker Botts, L.L.P., Respondent
Senator Patrick Leahy; Congressman Darrell Issa
William Henry Burgess IV — Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Amicus
Thales
Unified Patents, LLC
William G. Jenks — Jenks IP Law, Amicus
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Amicus