No. 23-241

Joe Salazar v. AT&T Mobility LLC, et al.

Lower Court: Federal Circuit
Docketed: 2023-09-13
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Tags: claim-construction due-process fifth-amendment investment-backed-expectations judicial-taking patent patent-rights property-rights takings takings-clause
Latest Conference: 2023-11-17
Question Presented (from Petition)

Where the Federal Circuit Panel's construction of petitioner's patent claim was unforesee able and unjustifiable under the circuit's prior decisions, disrupting petitioner's legitimate investment -backed expectations and rendering his and similarly situated patent owners' patent s worthless, does the Panel 's precedential opinion constitute a judicial taking of property in violation of the Fifth Amendment's Takings Clause?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does the Federal Circuit Panel's unforeseeable and unjustifiable construction of the petitioner's patent claim, disrupting the petitioner's legitimate investment-backed expectations and rendering the patent worthless, constitute a judicial taking of property in violation of the Fifth Amendment's Takings Clause?

Docket Entries

2023-11-20
Petition DENIED.
2023-11-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/17/2023.
2023-09-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 13, 2023)

Attorneys

Joe Salazar
Dariush KeyhaniKeyhani LLC, Petitioner