No. 18-5825
Eric Lamont Johnson v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: administrative-law administrative-procedure civil-procedure due-process federal-circuit international-trade-commission judicial-review patent patent-infringement standing
Latest Conference:
2018-10-05
Question Presented (from Petition)
counsel forfeifed My Meritoriols clain that wauld havk guaranteed
reliet when. he placed it in the Foot note and not in the body of
the Motion. He also declined Ho Arrend and add the clain wher
I fequested him to. . .Is this an bin professiomcel error that
entitles Ne to have the Forfeited Clain considered by the coust?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the ITC's decision to decline to adjudicate a patent infringement claim was an abuse of discretion
Docket Entries
2018-10-09
Petition DENIED.
2018-09-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/5/2018.
2018-09-06
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-08-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 28, 2018)
Attorneys
Eric Lamont Johnson
Eric Lamont Johnson — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent