I. TVa Following &uUtUnIs Based UP5n THt Fait [ Hat Fxuptional
ti U'umshrun Vlarrant TKt txmiH Of The tourU Biuret unary Powers
Baud Upon ThU*Extrcwdinary A/rit Request, And That Adequate Relief
bnnot Bt HUmed In Any (Him toofTKt PdiHmr Ore Would
Li \{i To Know Bid Thi TWomdS lu De#Hau legislative Authorisation
To Unufite By MifinS Of ImpUmenUFun their Holding Thai JUlKing
h FifU Timi Offenders Was Proptt Baud Upon jdZHCOs Tbwar
fcongftuifl'nfll HatufofyIntent ? .

1. Bid Longren Ever Authorize
To urn d S Hon-Rtudivi d S fird T mt Offender s Of | <Ud(0? ,

0. Under W Pat Part Of The lawful j R£ HCOPr oVl M 0 n ProvtUa
Authorization To The K\\ornlv Untal And Tint
Ftcluol Bureau Of Pfi&onS To Sustain The. Pdi Ho ner flu .
In lusAody Baud Upon Federal Lflngrmunal UgisUfion's
Intent As> k FiUi Tuva (JfUnder!

Did the Thomas Act have legislative authorization to generate by means of implementation their holding that stashing FAZCO's towards first time offenders was proper based upon Congressional statutory patent?