No. 20-5198

Franklin C. Smith v. Nurse Mayfield, et al.

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-07-29
Status: Dismissed
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: administrative-law civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-law due-process judicial-review legal-procedure patent standing statutory-interpretation takings
Latest Conference: 2020-09-29
Question Presented (from Petition)

ated intrinc os extsinsic missepsesentaion, ar othes tiscondnat of an adresce pasy
nch as, Cpi Fay pesinsed Limse eile sondes Dath tesif depition that detiones
-inq)
Confinement in sepsisal

owerex, Peitiones Smith had pesented pima face proof(bcments) that he
ideed dd i toe ievnces nith Fais sigate and ade mber nthn
So the boves Const of Apeds had depasted from Rude- sol sitinet sanation
ng the lower istict con grosy deseguding the dein of legldument
peren iudid poedingconstiteingmisepenton de snoey Jee
See Fonth Cisit spped Bsionin Case No s-asg The Cne sad ini

Bated 3oth i &gth Amdeto cn ismt ad aia tesia

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the lower court erred in its interpretation and application of the relevant constitutional and statutory provisions

Docket Entries

2020-10-05
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
2020-09-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-06-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 28, 2020)
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendixProof of Service

Attorneys

Franklin C. Smith
Franklin C. Smith — Petitioner