Gregory D. Kilpatrick v. Fabio Volterra
INFORM FEO-SEFLAINTIFF UOHEN SE RETURNED TO HIS CHNIC-JANUMY 1Z, JOMO THAT WA'S INFECTED WITHHSVH, HSVZ, SQUAMOUS EPITHECONTAMINATIONS?PAINTIFF AND UCINE MUCUS HIS CHNIC WHERE SIOTNESRNHHUTHH BLOOD ANDTOUK A VRINE SFEOIMEN DECEMBEL 042C1 DIDN'T MIBSM GINE SRO SE THE FRESCRIPTINS CTHEDISFOSABLE HYFODERMKC NEEDLE SYCINGES AND HE HQVID VIAL MEDICINETO GID THECONTAMII ATIONS?EOPLI-SIELD EASH-USHJO SK HERE IS NO CURE HY DIDI73547 TEHL FRO 3S THAT! 74031 CAVE MEA ALSE MEDICAL DIAGNOSES OF HSVI-HSVO: THE NOLDIAAN IS-O SNI L7SELI IU91A OR VCINE INFECTION GKO-SE COMPHAINED ITB54T ON TAN 12 DO1G AND DEL. O4 2015?JNLDLL IHS EL SI KHM QCININAL-OVIL FROM FROSELVTIO ENTAHLY-DELIBERATELY" DENTAL MEDICAL DIBNOT GEANT MAL CFUIO PRO-SEIFFFOR MICV: 109? FROSE 13541 ANDT TSHAY LHH 42 "Z FALSIFH THEBIOOD DIANOSE AND VFINE 1174036 WHY DID M.DONOVAN NYS. V AfPEALTO O.P.M.C. WHY DIDL.CROGAN V YS. HINDEE FROSE COMPLAINT WHY DID HEALTH CARE PROVIDER FELM3 SFELL AND WRITE(TYPE) 3547 FVHLNAME DONMENN INCORREOTLY 1VET POSEP S BECAVSE O.P.MC. INVESTIGATORS CHAIMTHAT 8S1 LSEL OHM MON LNO F2HL 2.CROGAN) INVESTIGATORS M.DONOVAN AND
Whether the court erred in dismissing the petitioner's claims