Whether by failing to clarify and update internet widespread dissemination access guidelines, U.S. courts imperil the rights of U.S. intellectual property owners.

Whether a decision based on the falsified report of a man who later confessed on FOX News that he was a "fixer" for President Clinton, can stand and set U.S. copyright precedent.

Whether a ruling that ignores superseding law, to base itself in subordinate law, can be valid.

Whether a plaintiff has the right to state his own copyright claims, or if the court has authority to omit and substantially alter a plaintiff's claims?

Whether by failing to clarify and update internet-access-guidelines, U.S. courts imperil the rights of U.S. intellectual-property-owners