Whether, the Supreme Court will consider the merits
of the decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the
FEDERAL Circuit, pursuant to Pro Se plaintiffs Motion
upon the NJ District Court , pursuant to Permission to
Appeal Case [3:19-cv-05945], by FRCP Rules 60(bY6\ and
Rule 60(d)flh wherein, were denied.

Whether, the Pro Se Plaintiff was righteously
provided 'provisional remedy mandate law, ' to Case [3:19cv-05945], which provides the Standards, that upon any
Rule 12(b)(6) Dismissal, failure to state a claim, a provision
for amendment , "must be provided " before dismissal
action can be upheld : [.Phillips v. County of Allegheny],
(3rd Cir. 2008).

Whether, such refusal actions by the lower courts are
Exceptional, Extraordinary Circumstance for Certiorari, per
i.

[Phillips v. County of Allegheny], (3rd Cir. 2008).

Whether, this initial case (along with its consolidated
case), was wrongly dismissed; whereby, Pro Se Plaintiff
was never provided any amendment whatsoever nor any
Standards of the mandate law [Phillips]. Plaintiff did not
amend, did not stand, was not given Opinion Statement why
amendment would be futile . Whereby whether, request
directed to the NJ District Court per "Permission
to Appeal, " is reasonably, rishteouslv just .

Whether, subsequent claims also dismissed in a
subsequent, timely brought, separate cause of action case,
consolidated therein, the FEDERAL Appeal Case: No.
[2023: 23-1020 and 23-1022] was wrongly, incorrect and
unjust.

Whether, all claims were righteously adjudicated.

Whether, this Court has the power to justify relief,
and relieve this Pro Se Plaintiff of judgement.

Whether, exhausting remedies to request to Reopen
Case, and Permission to Appeal, now again, in following,
reopens further Case in re-new, Petition for Extraordinary
Writ of Mandamus.

Whether, the "distinct mandate law, ' egregiously
withheld from Pro Se Plaintiff, which egregiously removed
her judicial rights and due process rights is Righteous or
Just; wherein, Certiorari aids in appellate jurisdiction.

Whether the Supreme Court will consider the merits of the decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit