Is it reasonably pertinent to diagnosisd or treat(mend)" when the stade ments made are clearly beyond the Scope of a SANE examination& Would this be hearsay if the same examinator from Sane testified as to the psychological and emotional injory and the actions of the acused?

Whether the statements made by the expert (SANE) beyond the scope of a SANE examination would be considered hearsay of the same examination from the SANE, which could affect the psychological and emotional impact and the actions of the accused?