No. 19-6760
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: administrative-procedure-act constructive-amendment criminal-procedure double-jeopardy federal-rules-of-civil-procedure fifth-amendment indictment indictment-modification polygamy polygamy-charge
Key Terms:
FifthAmendment HabeasCorpus Immigration
FifthAmendment HabeasCorpus Immigration
Latest Conference:
2020-01-10
Question Presented (from Petition)
THE INDICTMENT, AND WHETHER THIS CONSTITUTES A DOUBLE JEOPARDY VIOLATION N AS THE GOVERNMENT CAN LATER BRING A NEW CHARGE FOR POLYGAMY.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a constructive amendment occurred at trial when the court found defendant guilty of multiple marriages, a charge not on the indictment, and whether this constitutes a double jeopardy violation as the government can later bring a new charge for polygamy
Docket Entries
2020-01-13
Petition DENIED.
2019-12-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.
2019-12-04
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-11-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 26, 2019)
Attorneys
Ijaz Khan
Ijaz Khan — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent