1. IN RE: PORNGRAPHIC MATERIAL: PORN. PORNGRAPHIC PICTURES AND IMAGES:
A) Can a pornographic conviction of Possession of Child Pornography stand where the Supreme Court of the
United States RULED that such pictures/images IS LEGAL and permissible pursuant to : U.S.C.A. 1: U.S.C.A.
4; U.S.C.A. 14, Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition. 122 S. Ct. 1389; Ashcroft v. ACLU. 122 S. Ct. 1700?
B) Does Petitioner have a Free Speech Protection and safeguard protected under the Free Speech Constitution
Amendment safeguarded by Due Process pursuant to U.S.C.A. L 5. 14: Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition. 122
S. Ct. 1389; Ashcroft v. ACLU. 122 S. Ct. 1700? C) Does Petitioner have a Right to Privacy in a non
working, tom up and defunct laptop computer and cell phone data, stored data consisting of child pornography,
pornography pictures, and images? (Some, much of which Petitioner was not aware of, not Petitioner 's own, or,
belonging to someone else, other than Petitioner?) U.S.C.A. L 4, 5, 14 (Material was not Petitioner 's and
Petitioner knew nothing about any pornographic images!)? D) Did Oklahoma exceed their scope and enter
arbitrariness in making and framing its new, but changed, child pornography laws in not considering the
legality, legalness of First Amendment Free Speech laws, constitution violating the United States Sup
Court precedent striking down the laws as unconstitutional in part pursuant to U.S.C.A. 1, 14; Ashcroft v. Free
Speech Coalition, 122 S. Ct. 1389; Ashcroft v. ACLU. 122 S. Ct. 1700?reme

2. IN RE: SEARCH AND SEIZURE VIOLATIONS:
A) Was a search warrant required to see, find, obtain and seize, and to tear apart a computer that was tom up
and defunct in search of child pornography, pornography, and pornography images? B) Is the stored data
cell phones and on computers protected by the right to privacy? New Rulings: Carpenter v. U.S., 138 S. Ct.
2206 (2018); Byrd v. U.S., 138 S. Ct. 1518 (2018) : Collins v. Virginia, 138 S. Ct. 1663 (2018).on
C) Was
a search warrant required for the police to detain, threaten, coerce, duress Petitioner while holding him in
custody for nearly three (3) hours in forcing Petitioner to confess and tell the police where the cell phone with
cell phone data was stored, and also the tom up defunct laptop-cell phone-equipped computer with computer
data and alleged stored pornographic pictures was stored and not working? D) Was the police conduct
arbitrary where no special or exigent circumstances existed? (Non-violent situations?) E) Was the search
warrant violative and wrongfully implemented two (2) years

Question not identified