Shondor Janell Arceneaux v. United States
I.
If §924(c) applies to predicate crimes, 1 whose Elements are
no Broader than a Federal Generic Definition of that crime , is...
remand required if a defendant is only convicted aiding abetting.,
a bank robbery under §2113(a)(d) ?
II.
Is it Unconstitutional for a sentence under §924(c) to be
applied as a penalty for a violation of §2113 (a) "bank robbery" if
the statute[§2113(a)] is broader than the federal generic definition
of robbery, inccmpasing conduct outside the federal definition if
robbery, includes staking of property as defined "larceny" ?
III.
When a statute is clearly not a crime of violence under the
force clause of §924(c) is it Unconstitutional to sentence a defendant
under §924(c)(3)(B)'s residual clause ?
IV.
Is a court required to give a jury instructions of "advance-
knowledge" of.a firearm being used and the government is required to
prove a defendant had "advanced knowledge" before a jury can convict
_ • •
a defendant of aiding abetting in violation of 18 U.S.C. §2 ?
If §924(c) applies to predicate crimes whose elements are no broader than a Federal Generic Definition of that crime, is remand required if a defendant is only convicted aiding abetting a-bank robbery under §2113(a)(d) 2?