No. 19-554
50 Murray Street Acquisition LLC v. John Kuzmich, et al.
Amici (2)
Experienced Counsel
Tags: due-process fifth-amendment fourteenth-amendment judicial-takings lower-manhattan-revitalization-plan property-rights rent-stabilization section-421-g takings-clause
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess Takings Securities Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri Jurisdiction
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess Takings Securities Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri Jurisdiction
Latest Conference:
2020-01-10
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments prohibit courts, like other branches of government, from eliminating established property rights without just compensation.
2. Whether the New York Court of Appeals effected an unconstitutional taking by holding, contrary to decades of settled law and practice, that properties receiving benefits under Section 421-g of the New York Real Property Tax Law are ineligible for deregulation under New York's rent-stabilization laws.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether courts can eliminate established property rights without just compensation
Docket Entries
2020-01-13
Petition DENIED.
2019-12-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.
2019-12-09
Reply of petitioner 50 Murray Street Acquisition LLC filed.
2019-11-27
Brief amicus curiae of The Real Estate Board of New York filed.
2019-11-27
Brief amicus curiae of Professor Richard A. Epstein filed.
2019-11-22
Brief of respondents John Kuzmich, et al. in opposition filed.
2019-10-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 29, 2019)
Attorneys
50 Murray Street Acquisition LLC
Mark W. Mosier — Covington & Burling, LLP, Petitioner
John Kuzmich, et al.
Robert S. Smith — Friedman Kaplan Seiler & Adelman LLP, Respondent
Professor Richard A. Epstein
The Real Estate Board of New York
Andrew John Pincus — Mayer Brown LLP, Amicus