18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3)(A)'s FORCE CLAUSE requires the use of "physical force" (i.e: "violence force" meaning "force capable of causing PHYsICAL in Dimaya) against the person OR PRoPERTY of another. How is any court meant (H to determine what constitutes enough "physical force against property" to equate to what might result in "physical pain or injury to a person," since property cannot itself sustain an injury causing "pain."... Could. § 924(c)(3)(A) also be "unconstitutionally vague" due to the included [use of physical force against "property,"] a term that was NOT used in any of the other definitions provided for a "crime of violence" under 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(B)(2), 18 U.S.C. § 16, USSG § 4B1.2, or USSG. § 2L1.2...

Whether 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3)(A)'s force clause is unconstitutionally vague due to the inclusion of 'physical force against property' as a basis for a 'crime of violence'