Quintin Irving Brown v. City of Richmond, Virginia
I. WHEN A TRIAL OCCURS OVER A DEFENDANT'S EXPRESSED OBJECTIONS TO A VIOLATION OF THAT STATE'S STATUTORY RIGHT TO SPEEDY TRIAL—WITH THAT CONVICTION BE REVERSED AND FOREVER DISCHARGED?
II. WHEN FELONY CHARGES ARE REDUCED TO MISDEMEANORS IN ANY COURT OF ANY STATE OF THE UNITED STATES WHERE THE MAXIMUM PUNISHMENT IS 12 MONTHS, YET 3 YEARS OF PROBATION AND SUSPENDED SENTENCE ARE IMPOSED, WILL THAT SET ASIDE JUDGMENT BE REVERSED?
III. WHEN LAW ENFORCEMENT PERSONNEL, PROSECUTORIAL, AND JUDGES IN ANY STATE OF THE UNITED STATES USE DECEIT, DECEPTION, FRAUD, MISREPRESENTATION, MENDACITIES AND MALFEASANCE TO OBTAIN AND SECURE CONVICTIONS WILL THE CHARGES BE VOID AB INITIO AND CORAM NON JUDICE?
IV. WHEN DEFENSE COUNSEL IS REQUESTED TO BE WITHDRAWN AS INADEQUATE, INCOMPETENT AND INEFFECTIVE IN ASSISTANCE OF ANY STATE COURT OF ANY STATE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THE JUDGMENT IS SET ASIDE PROVING THOSE CLAIMS, WILL THE CONVICTION BE REVERSED?
When a trial occurs over a defendant's expressed objections to a violation of that state's statutory right to speedy trial, when should the conviction be reversed and forever discharged?