1) DOES Diruaya , 138 S.Ct. 1204 (2018), when the Petitioner was on Direct appeal of his
18 U.S.C. §I6(b) Unconstitutional and void argument under Vivas-Ceja , 808 F.3d 719
(7th Cir. 2015) and Baptiste , 841 F.3d 601 (3rd Cir. 2016), require all Counts 1-6,
not merely Count 4- to be reviewed, and this Constitutional error must be corrected,
and quickly, as. applied ab initio, Petitioner would be released since 2005 ?
REMAND IS THUS THE PROPER REMEDY HEREIN.

2) DOES Davis , 2019 US App,LEXIS 1284, when Petitioner on Direct Appeal at the time,
arguing Cardena, 842 F.3d 954 (7th Cir. 2016), which both state that 18 U.S.C.. §924 „
(C)(3)(B) is Unconstitutional and void, apply, should 18 U.S.C. §16(b) tinder Dimaya,
to charges of 26 U.S.C. §5845, require Remand from Appeal for his Counts 5 & 6 ?
REMAND IS THUS THE PROPER REMEDY HEREIN.

3) DOES Rehaif, 139 S.Ct. 2191 (2019) require remand, as the Direct Appeal of a lack of
the essential element of 'knowledge* under 26 U.S.C. §58^jf. coupled with new evidence
of Petitioner*s ACTUAL INNOCENCE , that the Informant held ACTUAL POSSESSION of the
5 &handgrenades after Petitioner left the United States,,and had PLANTED
THEM AS EVIDENCE WITH FBI ASSISTANCE AND APPROVAL , require remand with Instructions
for hearing, as soon as Court may schedule it ?
REMAND WITH INSTRUCTIONS FOR A FULL HEARING IS THE PROPER REMEDY HEREIN.

4) DOES Hull , 456 F.3d 133 (3rd Cir. 2006), which states that *mere possession of a pipe
bomb is not a crime of violence *, [26 U.S.C. §5845], apply to Counts 5 & 6 for this
Petitioner, as they determined Hull prior to conviction of Petitioner, also using
18 U.S.C. §16(b), which is Unconstitutional and void per Baptiste and Dimaya now ?
REMAND WITH INSTRUCTION FOR APPLICATION OF HULL IS THE PROPER REMEDY HEREIN.

5) DOES the fact that either under Dimaya , Bapti ste and Vivas-Ceja, or Dimaya alone,
or Dimaya in combination with Davis and Cardena , which would render all Counts 1-6
Unconastitutional and void, thus Petitioner has been, applying the ab initio holding ,
illegally detained since 2005, require immediate remand with instruction to release ?
REMAND WITH INSTRUCTIONS IS THUS THE PROPER REMEDY HEREIN.

6) DOES F.

Does Dimaya require all counts to be reviewed?