No. 19-25
Irma Rosas v. Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Chicago
Relisted (2)
Tags: accepted-and-usual-course certiorari civil-procedure civil-rights due-process erickson-v-pardus judicial-proceedings legal-standard pro-se pro-se-litigant procedural-error standing supreme-court-review
Latest Conference:
2020-01-10
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
WHETHER THE LOWER COURT, IN CONFLICT WITH THIS COURT'S HOLDING IN ERICKSON V. PARDUS, 551 U.S. 89 (2007), SO FAR DEPARTED FROM THE ACCEPTED AND USUAL COURSE OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS PERTAINING TO PRO SE LITIGANTS.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the lower court, in conflict with this Court's holding in Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89 (2007), so far departed from the accepted and usual course of judicial proceedings pertaining to pro se litigants
Docket Entries
2020-01-13
Rehearing DENIED.
2019-12-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.
2019-10-26
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-08-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-05-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 2, 2019)
Attorneys
Irma Rosas
Irma Rosas — Petitioner