| 22-6551 |
Palani Karupaiyan v. Township of Woodbridge, New Jersey, et al. |
Third Circuit |
2023-01-17 |
Dismissed |
IFP |
civil-rights due-process judicial-review legal-remedy mandamus municipal-court parental-rights procedural-relief prohibition standing takings writ |
Petitioner's reliefs were prayed as Writ of Mandamus or Prohibition or alternative so the questions were part of three test condition of the Writs. |
| 21-105 |
Harmon L. Taylor v. City of Sherman, Texas, et al. |
Fifth Circuit |
2021-07-26 |
Denied |
|
compelled-commerce compelled-consent disqualification due-process illegal-seizure judicial-discretion malicious-prosecution municipal-court pro-se-litigation transfer-of-venue venue-transfer |
1. Was it abusive to deny that extension?
2. Is the TEX. TRANSP. CODE "unconstitutional," as applied?
3. Did Respondents illegally seize Taylor's va… |
| 20-653 |
Henry Hamilton v. City of Hayti, Missouri, et al. |
Eighth Circuit |
2020-11-12 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
arrest-warrant arrest-warrants discretionary-authority fourth-amendment gerstein-v-pugh judicial-immunity municipal-court probable-cause quasi-judicial-immunity |
In Gerstein v. Pugh, 420 U.S. 130 (1974), this Court found a prosecutor was disqualified from making a determination of probable cause for the issuanc… |
| 19-7279 |
Charlotte Oliphant-Johns v. Good Deal Remodeling |
Pennsylvania |
2020-01-17 |
Denied |
IFP |
appeals appellate-review civil-procedure civil-rights court-records court-system due-process jurisdiction legal-filing municipal-court procedural-error record-keeping standing |
I WHAT LAWS OF CINIL COURT JURIS dICTION E OD SHN PE HE MT T V T I RECIEVED?
2 WHY WERE tHE dEFENDANTS bARELY QUESTIONED CONCERNINg MY COMPLAINT?
3.… |
| 19-6369 |
Kelly Dutton v. American Bankers Insurance Company |
Pennsylvania |
2019-10-24 |
Denied |
IFP |
bad-faith bad-faith-claim breach-of-contract civil-procedure insurance insurance-contract jurisdiction municipal-court statute-of-limitations summary-judgment |
UNDER 42 PA. C. S. A. 5524, does this rule exclude municipal court from statute of limitation?
UNDER 42 PA. C. S. A. 5525. does this rule apply only … |
| 18A1235 |
Kelly Dutton v. American Bankers Insurance Company |
Pennsylvania |
2019-05-29 |
Presumed Complete |
|
bad-faith-claim breach-of-contract insurance-contract municipal-court statute-of-limitations third-party-beneficiary |
When the court dismiss plaintiff's case, were appellan rights violated? |
| 18-1291 |
Linda Thurman, et al. v. Judicial Correction Services, Inc., et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
2019-04-11 |
Denied |
Amici (3)Response WaivedRelisted (2) |
circuit-split civil-procedure civil-rights due-process federal-district-courts judicial-review jurisdiction municipal-court private-probation probation-order rooker-feldman rooker-feldman-doctrine standing state-court-judgment void-ab-initio |
Whether Rooker–Feldman doctrine applies when the underlying state-court judgment is void ab initio. |
| 18-6516 |
Linh Thi Minh Tran v. Happy Valley Municipal Court, Oregon |
Oregon |
2018-10-31 |
Denied |
IFP |
14th-amendment 8th-amendment constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process fair-trial judicial-error jurisdiction municipal-court sentencing zoning-violation |
Was the trial court Clackamas State of Oregon's judgment sentence Municipal Court dated 01/26/2017 in favor of respondent Happy Valley Municipal Court… |