No. 18-1291

Linda Thurman, et al. v. Judicial Correction Services, Inc., et al.

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2019-04-11
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Amici (3)Response WaivedRelisted (2) Experienced Counsel
Tags: circuit-split civil-procedure civil-rights due-process federal-district-courts judicial-review jurisdiction municipal-court private-probation probation-order rooker-feldman rooker-feldman-doctrine standing state-court-judgment void-ab-initio
Latest Conference: 2019-06-13 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)

Whether Rooker–Feldman doctrine applies when the underlying state-court judgment is void ab initio.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether Rooker-Feldman doctrine applies when the underlying state-court judgment is void ab initio

Docket Entries

2019-06-17
Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Fane Lozman GRANTED.
2019-06-10
Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Fane Lozman DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/13/2019.
2019-05-28
Petition DENIED.
2019-05-10
Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Fane Lozman. (Distributed)
2019-05-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/23/2019.
2019-05-01
Waiver of right of respondents Judicial Correction Services, Inc., et al. to respond filed.
2019-04-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 13, 2019)

Attorneys

Fane Lozman
Jason Paul SteedKilpatrick Townsend & Stockton, LLP, Amicus
Judicial Correction Services, Inc., et al.
Wilson Franklin GreenFleenor & Green LLP, Respondent
Linda Thurman, et al.
Gregory M. LipperClinton & Peed, Petitioner