No. 19-6632

Samier Patrick Clark v. United States

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-11-14
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: adam-walsh-act civil-rights constitutional-rights criminal-procedure double-jeopardy due-process ineffective-assistance ineffective-counsel prosecutorial-misconduct sentencing-guidelines
Latest Conference: 2020-01-10
Question Presented (from Petition)

Was petitioner subjective to violations of his Constitutional rights throughout the course of his criminal prosecution?

Was petitioner subjective to an illegal sentence as it relates to the U.S.S.G., §3553 and the provisions of Rule 32?

Is the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006, unconstitutional as enacted by Congress?

Was petitioner subjected to double jeopardy in conviction of charges which "go hand-in-hand"?

Was petitioner subjective to ineffective or deficient represenation of defense counsel during his criminal prosecution?

Was petitioners case prejudiced against him due to the unprofessional actions federal agent investigating his criminal complaint?

Was petitioner's case further prejudiced by prosecutorial and judicial misconduct which went un-challenged by his defense counsel?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Was petitioner subjected to violations of his Constitutional rights throughout the criminal prosecution?

Docket Entries

2020-01-13
Petition DENIED.
2019-12-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.
2019-11-26
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-11-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 16, 2019)

Attorneys

Samier Patrick Clark
Samier Patrick Clark — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent