Whether The Defcndant's Knwingly with willful Misconduct
1.7
Dut due process of Law.
Yes s NO.
2.)
Whether The DeFendant's Volated A.R.s.4. b) MEMoRAuDUM
OF POiNTS AND AUTHORTTIES.
YesoNo.
Whether The Defendant's Filedluntimely no hearing Direct compaint
3.
July 15dol3 at 3:59pM. with a UnKnawn Complainant R.Hays July 182013.
Yes s Noo
4.)
Whether the Detendant's conduct was unteasonable when investigation of
OFficer's official Fled Paper work, suloission of indent Reports CiRs)
Became Faulty, resulting in Falsificd infomation by Ficer Tadd Gulod
#s083 and various Phocnix Polire Departuent oFFirerts).
Yes o N.
5.) Whether Defendant's may be sued in ther individucd capacity Fot Fraud
wantonness ilteu Misconduct viloting clearly established Protected ega
Bights and cil Rights?
Yeso ND
60.7
Their conspiracy to defraud by using dishonest means to cause harm and impenl
the eonomic interests of Channe sr, witth willful intent Knowledar that.
their actims will nesessarily result in the defrauding of Channelss. of
Lis constitutiona and ciil Riguts, That are Potected by La! Tie us,
yes or NDe.
whether Defendants knaingly with wilFduisonduct concaled the cond
0
that is cleary visilble an dovous in Fine Print ofFices T Gitord8083
in Origin Report Dr Numbe2BOo Fled DatdoB07Tme:0od3 AND
Supplment Report DR Number: 201301a8ole Befort Dete:d0B07l Timc:0529 are he
Same Beport. False and intered into the Department book, Jecord o repost any
inaccurate or False inFosmation, Aerations order 3.135.B. Fraud Reports/
OFFiial Paperuor Rues and Requlations Pe Rev.soly oerations oder3Be
"
AYes N

Whether the defendants' warrantless seizure and search of the plaintiffs' home violated the Fourth Amendment's prohibition on unreasonable searches and seizures