1.) Whether the Circuit Court of Appeals erred in holding that defendant's
motion for judgment of acquittal was properly denied by the District Court
when the government failed to prove, and the court did not instruct the jury
that the Government must have found that there was not sufficient evidence
showing that Petitioner Lee Hope knew of his prohibited status as an
unlawful user of a controlled substance under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(3), as that
term is defined under federal law as this Court has ruled in Rehaif v. United
States, 568 U.S. (2019); and

2.) Whether, in light of this Court's decision in Rehaif v. United States, 18
U.S.C. § 922(g)(3) is unconstitutionally vague, as a person's knowledge of
their prohibited status under said section is entirely subjective.

Whether the Circuit Court of Appeals erred in holding that defendant's motion for judgment of acquittal was properly denied by the District Court