Bradly M. Cunningham v. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc., et al.
1. Can the Court stay of this matter until final resolution of a related and dependant money damages case, Cunningham v. Washington County et al., 9th Circuit Case No. 18-35413 (see Tab C); or, in the alternative,
2. Can the Court Order: (a.) the Petitioner be allowed to obtain all withheld discovery from the SONY et al.; and, (b.) Order this lawsuit eligible for trial on the merits under ORS 31.150 et seq. (1995) with specific provisions: all relief is available to the Petitioner including defenses to his [wrongful] conviction set forth in Cunningham v. Washington County et al., 9th Cir Case No. 18-35413 (Tab C), as well as available relief under the 1995 defamation/false-light statute, including but not limited to, a full retraction and correction of Dead by Sunset by SONY et al., in the same prominance as all the promotions and November 1995 broadcast, in compliance with ORS 31.150 et seq. (1995), and specifically pursuant to Petitioner's October 27, 2016 Demand for Retraction and Correction.
Whether the Court can stay this matter until final resolution of a related and dependent money damages case, or order the petitioner be allowed to obtain all withheld discovery from the respondents and make this lawsuit eligible for trial on the merits under Oregon's anti-SLAPP statute with specific provisions for available relief