No. 19-6837
Anzara Brown v. Dana Metzger, Warden, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: brady-v-maryland chain-of-custody civil-rights confidential-informant constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process evidence-disclosure exculpatory-evidence forensic-evidence medical-examiners witness-testimony
Latest Conference:
2020-01-10
Question Presented (from Petition)
I.
WHETHER THE STATE OF DELAWARE
CAN WITHOLD EXCUIPATORY EVIDENCE
RELATING TO THE STATES OFFICE
OF MEDICAL EXATMINERS OFFICIALS
i
STEALING DRUG EVIDENCE TAINTING
TO GIVECRIMIUIAL DEFENDANNTS
REMEDY ATLAW.
π0
WHETHER THE STATE OF DELAWARE
APPOINITMENT OF JUDEES SYSTEM HELD
TO BE UNCONSTETIOUAL BY THE UNITED
STATES DISRICT COURT OFDELAWARE
AND THIRD CIRCUIT COUNT OF ASPEALS
REMEDIES BEFORE BRINCING HIS CLAIM
TO THE FEDERAL COURT FON KELIEF.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the state of Delaware can withhold exculpatory evidence relating to the state's office of medical examiners officials, denying true evidence from the chain of custody than a criminal defendant's remedy at law
Docket Entries
2020-01-13
Petition DENIED.
2019-12-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.
2019-12-11
Waiver of right of respondent Metzger, Warden, et al. to respond filed.
2019-12-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 3, 2020)
Attorneys
Anzara Brown
Anzara Brown — Petitioner
Metzger, Warden, et al.