Can a defendant be stoped from Confronting his
accusers and witnesses with o ther testimony
when the sth Amendment to the li.s. Const. Provides
for Due processP

2. If a defendants Counsel Compelles
D
defen dant
to not
by threat of taking
testify
awaY the
right to
Counsel
is ita violation
o f
the oth
−
Amendment to the li.S. Const.?

3.
due
Sec. 23,18iand 19 what jurisdiction does the
Convicting
tourt have over tne
Person of the
defendent
when
Counsel for this Purpose isnot
Present?

4.
Can the right to Counsel be waived when a Counsel's
defendant did not waived the right Knowingly, or
Conviction be obtained in accord with the U.S.
and the N.C. tonst. Art.
Const. Am.S aud6
I secl9and 23?

5.I s it cruel and innusal Punishment lnder the 8th
Am. to the U.S. Const. to imiosq a 12 tol7yr.
sentence ana defeudent who was deyied the
rignt to Present evidence in his own defense
when the U.S. tonst. 5th anendment Provides
for
due lrocess and defendents Counsel ineffectiveeffcctive Counsel?

Whether the 5th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution provides for due process when the State compels a defendant to testify against himself by threat of taking all of his counsel's assets