No. 19-6467
Robert G. Pulley v. Daniel Paramo, Warden, et al.
IFP
Tags: actual-innocence due-process federal-court federal-habeas habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel miscarriage-of-justice procedural-default state-court
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2020-01-10
Question Presented (from Petition)
Question number one of five
Question number two of five
Question number three of five
Question number four of five
Question number five of five
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the actual innocence exception to the procedural default doctrine applies to excuse the petitioner's failure to raise certain claims in state court
Docket Entries
2020-01-13
Petition DENIED.
2019-12-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.
2019-09-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 2, 2019)
Attorneys
Robert G. Pulley
Robert G. Pulley — Petitioner