No. 19-5697
Felipe Vinagre-Hernandez v. United States
Tags: criminal-procedure detention detention-motion federal-rules-of-criminal-procedure indictment judicial-interpretation jurisdiction legal-timing pretrial-motion speedy-trial-act
Latest Conference:
2020-01-10
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether a motion for detention filed before an indictment or information charging a person has been obtained is a pretrial motion within the meaning of the Speedy Trial Act.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a motion for detention filed before an indictment or information charging a person has been obtained is a pretrial motion within the meaning of the Speedy Trial Act
Docket Entries
2020-01-13
Petition DENIED.
2019-12-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.
2019-11-26
Reply of petitioner Felipe Vinagre-Hernandez filed.
2019-11-19
Brief of respondent United States of America in opposition filed.
2019-10-17
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 20, 2019.
2019-10-16
Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 21, 2019 to November 20, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-09-20
Response Requested. (Due October 21, 2019)
2019-09-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-09-03
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2019-08-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 23, 2019)
Attorneys
Felipe Vinagre-Hernandez
Philip J. Lynch — Law Offices of Phil Lynch, Petitioner
United States of America
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent