Ndokley Peter Enow v. Ricky Foxwell, Warden, et al.
Did the trial court erred by admitting into evidence of the illegally obtained wiretapped tape recording of the defendant's oral conversations with the montgomery county police (mcl) undertover agent?
Was the eridence sufficient to Show that the defendant was the solicitor, or was he merely a solicitee who acquiesced to the state agent soliitation?
Did the guilty plea vior dire established that the defendant nad the requisite understanding of the of 4a4otsy05 to Jn 24 to stu0 pu 2itb commit first degree murder?
Did the trial court erred in determining that the defendant's guilty plea was Knowingly and volntarily entered witth understanding of ihe trne nature of the
Did the trial court erred in depriving the defendant of his constitutional rights to all post conviction rights including the rigut to file a motion to reconsider and request a three-jugge panet or appead?
Does the use of solicitation as a common law crime violate thne 8th and l4th amendment of the United States (u.s.) constitution ?
If the crime of solicitation ocured, did it ocurred at prior to the times charge in the inditment? a time
Did the triat court erred in charging the elements of the solicitation Crine?
Was the alleged solicitation crime too vague and
Did the trial court err by admitting into evidence the illegally obtained wiretap recordings of the defendant's phone conversations with an undercover agent?