No. 19-391
Assured Guaranty Corp., et al. v. Financial Oversight and Management Board for Puerto Rico, et al.
Tags: automatic-stay bankruptcy-code bond-debt debt-enforcement municipal-bankruptcy municipal-bond-market special-revenues
Latest Conference:
2020-01-10
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether 11 U.S.C. § 922(d) mandates that there is no automatic stay of debt enforcement actions with respect to pledged special revenues.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether 11 U.S.C. § 922(d) mandates that there is no automatic stay of debt enforcement actions with respect to pledged special revenues
Docket Entries
2020-01-13
Petition DENIED.
2019-12-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.
2019-12-11
Reply of petitioners Assured Guaranty Corp., et al. filed.
2019-11-25
Brief of respondents Financial Oversight and Management Board for Puerto Rico, et al. in opposition filed.
2019-11-01
Waiver of right of respondent Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors to respond filed.
2019-10-24
Brief amicus curiae of Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association filed.
2019-10-02
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 25, 2019.
2019-09-30
Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 24, 2019 to November 25, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-09-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 24, 2019)
Attorneys
Assured Guaranty Corp., et al.
Neal Kumar Katyal — Hogan Lovells US LLP, Petitioner
Financial Oversight and Management Board for Puerto Rico, et al.
Martin J. Bienenstock — Proskauer Rose LLP, Respondent
Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors
Neal David Mollen — Paul Hastings LLP, Respondent
Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association