No. 19-6631
Tatyana E. Drevaleva v. Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California, San Mateo County, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: anti-SLAPP civil-procedure civil-rights first-amendment free-speech limited-civil-case standing tenant-rights unlawful-detainer
Latest Conference:
2020-01-10
Question Presented (from Petition)
1) Can a Tenant who was being evicted by a Landlord for expressing a
First Amendment right for a free speech file an anti-SLAPP Motion
pursuant to the California C.C.P. §425.16 if the Unlawful Detainer
lawsuit is a limited civil case?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Can a Tenant who was being evicted by a Landlord for expressing a First Amendment right for a free speech file an anti-SLAPP Motion pursuant to the California C.C.P. §425.16 if the Unlawful Detainer lawsuit is a limited civil case?
Docket Entries
2020-01-13
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
2019-12-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.
2019-12-04
Waiver of right of respondent Superior Court of Calfornia, San Mateo County to respond filed.
2019-10-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 16, 2019)
Attorneys
Superior Court of Calfornia, San Mateo County
Joseph K. Bravo — Bravo Law Offices, Respondent
Tatyana E. Drevaleva
Tatyana E. Drevaleva — Petitioner