Dario Rodriguez v. Rick Scott, et al.
Immigration
1.) This Country built on Free speech and A55was ates Corstitution 15t, 4t2, 8114th. Anerchent.The right to protection against crnel & uushal paurshment 0 right to Critite Goverdment ofFFicial's, stateor Fe deat OFFicr's and write grieanci's. Call hone, fam17 friend's and the right to Assoicate with counsed.
2.) UNDer the PLra 28 U.5.C.1915A(0)b) Frivolaus "wshereit lack's ar arghable basis eithier ia law or in fact. Neitzke V. willians 490 4.5.319, 3251 6831 why did Congress create this Law?
3.) why is Congress only Concerved with 28U.5.C. 915AB1)? failure to state a clain upow whichreliet may be granted?
4.) The Suprime Count clarifie's srinmate presenting f51 why 7 in the 14th Amendment decid P! a Congress Oue process my
5.) For relief ina retali6.)To claim lut's say State a ation thansfer. I nmate's must allege 1.)his Spech wad SuFmd AOur8L action 3.)there is a cashal Connection between the rer taliatony action s the protecded speech? why?
6.) IF the State or Federal Count's only need probable Calse. Incueding, prosecutor's Lave beer giver Contement Anhority. why did the Oistrict Court's dismiss Case? my
7.) why Court's Cr Did Congress only Grant the Fecdena! matter junistition? U.5. Cout of Appeal's. Subject
8.) IDn Ruse 8) clain's for reliet (Frep why did longress aMou B the Suprene Cont's. A. AShort ard plain Lyrg Statemnt of the gromds /dain. showing the pleaderi entithed to relief?
9.) I(Frep) 636 jurisdiction, poweis and tenporary went's. why is ny jundge aSSiSn Allowed to dismiss ny Cade FoL been Satistied rele dismiss my case upon These grouds? In relict songt rectly my judge allowed to disniss my cade under lack of pro Secution if I possess lack of legel edneation or theor
10.) IF in the Sanerule 6olFrep) a judgnent may beke marlel or reversed Coustroon. For Cowection to the Sane Dasedl on cheical error, mistake, oversight or omission. tonever one is Fourd in a jndgenent order or Ofter pard the Recond. why do's the rae Seem to Applie only Far the Count's in question?
11.) why is the Cout's Allowed power of enforcenent and Lqfroddns Several rutis and Statue's?
12.) uhy does the District Count's provide tor nodif cate ou of Jnelgnent? when the Disthet Court's Seem to equvically a Show the jilgrent hane prospective application?
13.) In fact wa
Whether the petitioner's constitutional rights to free speech, due process, and equal protection were violated