aedpa-restrictions
5 cases — ← All topics
| Case | Title | Lower Court | Docketed | Status | Flags | Tags | Question Presented |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25-5703 | In Re Steven Ray Wycoff | 2025-09-23 | Denied | IFP | aedpa-restrictions conflict-of-interest due-process habeas-corpus innocence-claim prosecutorial-misconduct | 1. Whether upon.a court of appeals' denial of leave to file a second federal habeas application AEDPA's § 2244(b) (3) (E) prohibits any party from see… | |
| 23-6236 | Joseph R. Dickey v. Warden, FCI Marianna | Eleventh Circuit | 2023-12-12 | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | 28-usc-2244 28-usc-2255 actual-innocence aedpa aedpa-restrictions constitutional-challenge federal-prisoner felker-v-turpin habeas-corpus successive-petition | In light of the plain language contained in 28 U.S.C. 2244(b)(1), which requires any claim presented in a second or successive habeas corpus "applicat… |
| 20-6906 | Charles Hamilton v. Steven Johnson, Administrator, New Jersey State Prison, et al. | Third Circuit | 2021-01-15 | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | aedpa aedpa-restrictions counsel-of-choice criminal-defendant criminal-defendant-rights federal-law sixth-amendment state-court state-court-review | 1. Whether a State Court's erroneous denial of a criminal defendant's Sixth Amendment Right to be represented by counsel of choice, resulted in a d… |
| 19-5463 | Jesse Dean v. United States | Eleventh Circuit | 2019-08-05 | Denied | Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP | actual-innocence aedpa-restrictions anti-terrorism-and-effective-death-penalty-act brady-v-maryland criminal-jurisdiction criminal-offense due-process federal-procedure fraud habeas-corpus jurisdiction kyles-v-whitley | Whether the District Court had jurisdiction where Petitioner was indicted for acts which do not constitute a criminal offense? Whether Petitioner's c… |
| 18-738 | Henry Paul Richardson v. United States | Fourth Circuit | 2018-12-10 | Denied | Response Waived | actual-innocence aedpa aedpa-restrictions circuit-split constitutional-claims defaulted-claims habeas habeas-corpus procedural-default sawyer-v-whitley schlup-v-delo standard-of-review | Whether The Standard That Governs the AEDPA Provisions, 28 U.S.C. §2255(h)(1), §2244(b)(2)(B)(ii), and §2244(b)(3)(A), is inapplicable To A Second Hab… |