1. Whether a State Court's erroneous denial of a
criminal defendant's Sixth Amendment Right to
be represented by counsel of choice, resulted
in a decision that was contrary to, or involved
an unreasonable application of "clearly established"
Federal law as determined by the Supreme Court, of
the United States?

2. Whether a State Court's erroneous denial of a
criminal defendant's Sixth Amendment Right to
be represented by counsel of choice, meet the
restrictive Antiterrorism and Effective Death
Penalty Act(AEDPA ), which put restrictions on
Federal courts hearing petitions by State
prisoners?

Whether a State Court's erroneous denial of a criminal defendant's Sixth Amendment Right to be represented by counsel of choice resulted in a decision that was contrary to or involved an unreasonable application of clearly established Federal law