In light of the plain language contained in 28 U.S.C. 2244(b)(1), which requires any claim presented in a second or successive habeas corpus "application under Section 2254" that was presented in a prior application" to be dismissed, does 28 U.S.C. 2244(b)(1) apply to claims which were in an actual habeas petition and/or an application presented by a federal prisoner under 28 U.S.C. 2255?

Is the legal framework in the Eleventh Circuit unconstitutional for federal prisoners who uncover new evidence of actual innocence?

Did the Supreme Court's decision in Felker v Turpin 518 U.S. 651 (1996) leave open the possibility of an "as applied" challenge to the AEDPA's restrictions for filing a successive 2255?

Does it violate the United States Constitution to imprison someone for life who is actually innocent without any way to present newly discovered evidence or actual innocence?

Whether 28 U.S.C. 2244(b)(1) applies to claims in 28 U.S.C. 2255 motions