No. 19-6287
Seferino Martinez v. United States
IFP
Tags: 28-usc-2255 armed-career-criminal-act career-offender criminal-sentencing-guidelines johnson-v-united-states residual-clause section-2255 sentencing-guidelines void-for-vagueness
Latest Conference:
2020-01-10
Question Presented (from Petition)
I. Whether, for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 2255(f)(3), the new rule announced in Johnson applies to the analogous residual clause in the mandatory guidelines, USSG § 4B1.2(1) (1995)?
II. Whether the mandatory guidelines' residual clause, USSG § 4B1.2(1) (1995), is void for vagueness?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the new rule announced in Johnson applies to the analogous residual clause in the mandatory guidelines
Docket Entries
2020-01-13
Petition DENIED.
2019-12-06
Reply of petitioner Seferino Martinez filed. (Distributed)
2019-12-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.
2019-11-18
Memorandum of respondent United States filed.
2019-10-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 18, 2019)
Attorneys
Seferino Martinez
Stephen P. McCue — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent