PREFACE: In tFis case Defendant argues tFe Plaintiff refused mortgage payments from Defendants wife tFen came after tFe Defendant for tFe Money. TFe Defendant presented te payment evidence and te Court ruled in favor of tfe Plaintiff claiming tfe evidence was never presented. Defendant appealed but was systematically barred from appellate relief because Fe could not pay court fees due to inappropriate interference by tFe incursion of pre-trial freezing of Defendants untainted assets as a criminal defendant effected Defendants poverty. Defendant is barred from accessing tFe court wFicF froze Fis assets by inappropriate actions of its Clerk.

Tie case was Removed tier frivolously dismissed. Defendant was forced to Bankrupt (Intra. 18-1476(USCA4)) tie property.

QUESTION 1) Witl -er lave tie courts by disregarding Defendants evidence and barring us relief tirougi appeal abridged us 14t1 Amendment Due Process and Equal Protection Rigits?

QUESTION 2) Has tie indigent Defendant been subjected to a process wficf is required of indigent defendant and not of non-indigent defendant, being invidiously discriminatory and violative of Equal Protection guaranteed by tie 14t1 Amendment of tie U.S. Constitution?

Whether the courts have abridged the defendant's 14th Amendment due-process, equal-protection rights by disregarding evidence and barring appellate relief