| 25-6587 |
Jett Garriott Adams v. Dan Shannon, Director, Wyoming Department of Corrections, et al. |
Tenth Circuit |
2026-01-15 |
Pending |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
ake-v-oklahoma harmless-error-analysis indigent-defendant psychiatric-assistance sanity-defense sixth-amendment |
1. When this Court held in Ake v. Oklahoma that an indigent defendant must make a threshold showing that their sanity would be a significant factor at… |
| 25A754 |
Martez Abram v. Mississippi |
Mississippi |
2025-12-30 |
Application |
|
appellate-review constitutional-rights direct-appeal indigent-defendant mississippi-supreme-court supreme-court |
Question not identified. |
| 25A697 |
Tra'ven Boyer-Letlow v. United States |
Sixth Circuit |
2025-12-15 |
Application |
|
counsel-of-record criminal-conviction federal-appeal indigent-defendant petition-for-certiorari sixth-circuit |
Question not identified. |
| 25A471 |
Hasib Bin Golamrabbi v. California |
California |
2025-10-24 |
Application |
|
indigent-defendant law-library-access legal-research prisoner-rights pro-se-litigation supreme-court-procedure |
Question not identified. |
| 25A438 |
Demond Depree Bluntson v. Texas |
Texas |
2025-10-16 |
Presumed Complete |
|
capital-murder certiorari death-row due-process eighth-amendment indigent-defendant |
Whether the Court of Criminal Appeals' decision upholding the trial court's denial of Mr. Bluntson's request to represent himself because he allegedly… |
| 25-5677 |
Juan De Dios Alvarez-Romero v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
2025-09-18 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
§-2255 direct-appeal evidentiary-hearing indigent-defendant ineffective-assistance pro-se-motion |
Whether, if an indigent and incarcerated defendant with minimal education and no ability to comprehend English, for the first time on direct appeal wi… |
| 25A215 |
Gary David Green v. Texas |
Texas |
2025-08-22 |
Presumed Complete |
|
certiorari death-row death-sentence due-process indigent-defendant texas-criminal-appeals |
Question not identified. |
| 24A954 |
Altony Brooks v. Sergeant Sheila Johnston, et al. |
Fourth Circuit |
2025-04-07 |
Presumed Complete |
|
constitutional-rights court-fees criminal-justice due-process equal-protection indigent-defendant |
Question not identified. |
| 24-6828 |
Eric W. Strong v. Chris S. Buesgen, Warden |
Seventh Circuit |
2025-03-21 |
Denied |
IFP |
constitutional-claims due-process equal-protection habeas-corpus indigent-defendant no-merit-appeal |
I. On a no-merit appeal conducted pursuant to Anders v. Cal., does due process and equal protections require an indigent defendant be provided his att… |
| 24-5959 |
Robert Ellis v. New York |
New York |
2024-11-13 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
assigned-counsel attorney-client-relationship continuity-of-representation court-discretion indigent-defendant sixth-amendment |
When counsel has been assigned to represent an indigent defendant, has developed a close working relationship, and faces no obstacles to continuing th… |
| 24-436 |
Robert James Rainey v. Colorado |
Colorado |
2024-10-18 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
appointed-counsel constitutional-rights criminal-procedure indigent-defendant right-to-counsel sixth-amendment |
Whether, once counsel has been appointed for an indigent defendant, the Sixth Amendment guarantees the defendant the same right to continued represent… |
| 24-5601 |
In Re David Wayne Nelson |
|
2024-09-20 |
Denied |
IFP |
appeal-waiver constitutional-rights court-appointed-counsel indigent-defendant procedural-due-process right-to-counsel |
In the Court's Holding that prejudice is presumed regardless of an appeal waiver in a state criminal case, Garza v. Idaho, 586 U.S. 232 (2019) also me… |
| 23-7436 |
Eagles Denashu Begay v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
2024-05-09 |
Denied |
IFP |
28-usc-2255 appeal criminal-procedure direct-appeal due-process evidentiary-hearing habeas-corpus indigent-defendant ineffective-assistance pro-se-claim right-to-counsel |
If an indigent, incarcerated federal defendant, for the first time on direct appeal, raises a colorable claim of ineffective assistance by his distric… |
| 23-1096 |
William Allen Davis v. Colorado |
Colorado |
2024-04-09 |
Denied |
Amici (1)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (3) |
affluent-defendants appointed-counsel constitutional-rights continuity-of-representation criminal-procedure indigent-defendant indigent-defendants lower-court-split right-to-counsel sixth-amendment |
Whether, once counsel has been appointed for an indigent defendant, the Sixth Amendment guarantees the defendant the same right to continued represent… |
| 23-6390 |
Jose Guadalupe Ramirez v. Illinois |
Illinois |
2023-12-28 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
adolescent-brain-development due-process expert-assistance indigent-defendant mandatory-life-sentence right-to-present-defense sentencing |
Does a trial court deprive an indigent defendant of due process and the right to present a defense by failing to appoint an adolescent brain developme… |
| 23-6283 |
Stacy Anthony Mitchell v. Arkansas |
Arkansas |
2023-12-18 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
choice-of-counsel constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process indigent-defendant right-to-counsel sixth-amendment trial-court-discretion |
Does a trial court's denial of an indigent criminal defendant's choice of privately retained counsel, who is ready, willing, and able to proceed to tr… |
| 23-6007 |
Daniel A. Rocha v. Ricky D. Dixon, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
2023-11-14 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
collateral-review constitutional-rights due-process exhaustion-of-remedies habeas-corpus indigent-defendant ineffective-assistance procedural-rules time-limitations |
Does Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353 (1963), and its progeny, require a state court to advise an indigent defendant of the procedural rules and ti… |
| 23-5393 |
Shaun N. Taylor v. Illinois |
Illinois |
2023-08-18 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
ake-v-oklahoma criminal-procedure due-process expert-appointment expert-witness fourteenth-amendment indigent-defendant insanity-expert mental-competency mental-health right-to-counsel |
I. Do this Court's decisions in Ake v. Oklahoma and McWilliams v. Dunn require the appointment of a second insanity expert for an indigent defendant w… |
| 23-5237 |
Jordan Cole Laws v. United States |
Fourth Circuit |
2023-07-28 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
court-discretion criminal-procedure factual-findings indigent indigent-defendant justice-for-victims-of-trafficking-act sentencing special-assessment statutory-interpretation |
Did the district court err when it imposed a $5,000 special assessment, pursuant to the Justice for Victims of Trafficking Act of 2015, 18 U.S.C. § 30… |
| 23-5013 |
Brian Jury v. Ohio |
Ohio |
2023-06-30 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (3)IFP |
brady brady-violation civil-rule-60b due-process evidence evidence-suppression indigent-defendant new-trial new-trial-motion possession suppression |
This case poses a pressing issue of national importance. Did the Ohio Sixth District Court of Appeals impose an improper and unduly burdensome standar… |
| 22-7888 |
Desean Lamont Thomas, nka Pharaoh El-Forever Left-I Amen El v. Minnesota |
Minnesota |
2023-06-28 |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
due-process economic-barrier expert-testimony expert-witness indigent-defendant ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel pro-se strickland-standard |
1.Q) If a state conditions satisfying Strickland's first prong, on the testimony of two privately funded expert witnesses against a indigent pro se pr… |
| 22-6891 |
Joseph Dingler v. Texas |
Texas |
2023-02-28 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process fourteenth-amendment free-speech indigent-defendant post-conviction-relief standing takings trial-transcript voting |
Question not identified. |
| 22-6812 |
Ernest Luther Taylor v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
2023-02-17 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appeal court-appointed-counsel criminal-procedure indigent-defendant mental-health mental-illness restitution social-security social-security-disability |
1. Did the District Court err when it ordered defendant Taylor to pay interest on a $7500.00 restitution obligation, where the evidence showed that he… |
| 22-6691 |
Hugues-Denver Akassy v. Michael Kirkpatrick, Superintendent, Clinton Correctional Facility |
Second Circuit |
2023-02-02 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
criminal-charges criminal-indictment due-process habeas-corpus indigent-defendant judicial-procedure rape-case standing subject-matter-jurisdiction |
Can a court with lack of subject matter jurisdiction permit trumped-up criminal charges and indigent defendant to stand trial on charges not made in i… |
| 22-6397 |
Alex Daniel v. Illinois |
Illinois |
2022-12-27 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
ake-v-oklahoma appointed-counsel britt-v-north-carolina due-process fundamental-fairness griffin-v-illinois indigent-defendant self-representation sixth-amendment |
In Farretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806, 833-34 (1975), this Court recognized that the Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution guarantees cr… |
| 22-5172 |
Glen Torres v. Illinois |
Illinois |
2022-07-25 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
co-counsel constitutional-right counsel-of-choice disqualification indigent-defendant right-to-counsel sixth-amendment trial-representation |
Does the Sixth Amendment right to choose one's attorney apply to private and pro bono co-counsel? |
| 21-8248 |
Lorenzo Newborn, Karl Darnell Holmes, and Herbert McClain v. California |
California |
2022-06-28 |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
appointed-counsel court-appointment criminal-appeal criminal-procedure due-process in-forma-pauperis indigent-defendant indigent-status right-to-counsel supreme-court-rule writ-of-certiorari |
Question not identified. |
| 21-7561 |
Ana Duarte-Pineda v. United States |
Fourth Circuit |
2022-04-06 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-counsel appellate-review conflict-of-interest criminal-procedure due-process indigent-defendant ineffective-assistance pro-se-response sixth-amendment sua-sponte-replacement |
If an indigent criminal defendant's pro se response to a brief filed under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), alleges ineffective assistance o… |
| 21-7026 |
Nehemias Samayoa v. United States |
District of Columbia |
2022-02-01 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appeal appeal-withdrawal civil-rights coercion dual-sovereignty due-process effective-assistance-of-counsel federal-jurisdiction indigent-defendant standing state-court-judgment |
When a federal court enters a judgment without proper jurisdiction, does it reach an opinion that would justify a recall of mandate? |
| 21-5978 |
Derek Levert Hall v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
2021-10-15 |
Denied |
IFP |
circuit-split criminal-procedure indigent-defendant pro-se pro-se-representation right-to-counsel sixth-amendment trial-counsel waiver |
The federal courts of appeals are about evenly split over whether an indigent criminal defendant's waiver of trial counsel requires a clear and unequi… |
| 21-5531 |
Garlin Raymond Farris v. United States |
Fourth Circuit |
2021-08-30 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
agency-principles appointed-counsel criminal-procedure due-process excusable-neglect indigent-defendant ineffective-assistance-of-counsel pioneer-investment-services procedural-hurdles sixth-amendment |
The question presented, on which the federal appellate courts are currently
divided, is whether appointed counsel's misconduct can serve as excusable … |
| 21-5305 |
Alejandro Rosales-Gonzalez v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
2021-08-05 |
Denied |
Amici (2)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
ability-to-pay circuit-split constitutional-consideration constitutional-law criminal-fines eighth-amendment excessive-fines excessive-fines-clause fine-assessment indigent-defendant judicial-discretion |
Anyone can go to prison, but not everyone can pay a fine. The district court here imposed a $4,000 fine against Mr. Rosales-Gonzalez, an indigent, non… |
| 21-5276 |
William H. Bransford v. Dan Winkelski, Warden |
Seventh Circuit |
2021-08-03 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
aedpa-standard appellate-counsel civil-commitment dna-evidence due-process habeas-corpus indigent-defendant ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel plea-bargaining |
1. Should pre-A-EDP-A standard of a 2.8 4-.§2254 petition apply when an indigent defendant has been U.S.C. constructively abandoned by appointed appel… |
| 20-7288 |
Nazari Vasilich Cam v. Oregon |
Oregon |
2021-03-01 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-procedure criminal-procedure due-process fourteenth-amendment halbert-v-michigan indigent-defendant right-to-counsel sua-sponte-appointment swenson-v-bosler |
Whether a state appellate court must appoint counsel sua sponte for an indigent criminal defendant who represents himself at trial, files a notice of … |
| 20-7009 |
Mark Rudolph Arsenio Reed v. Robert Toole, Warden, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
2021-02-02 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
civil-rights due-process effective-assistance-of-counsel equal-protection first-amendment fourteenth-amendment indigent-defendant motion-in-arrest sixth-amendment standing |
Georgia state law O.C.G.A. 17-9-61 provides the following: (a) When a judgement has been rendered, either party may move in arrest thereof for any def… |
| 20-6341 |
Jason Harriman v. United States |
Eighth Circuit |
2020-11-16 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
adequate-inquiry appointed-counsel appointment-of-counsel civil-rights court-inquiry criminal-procedure due-process indigent-defendant legal-representation right-to-counsel sixth-amendment |
1. Whether a defendant's 6th Amendment right to counsel of choice extends to an indigent defendant who has appointed counsel.
2. The extent of the ad… |
| 20-5119 |
Wayne Powell v. Ohio |
Ohio |
2020-07-21 |
Denied |
IFP |
death-penalty due-process eighth-amendment expert-funding hurst-v-florida indigent-defendant ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel postconviction-relief sixth-amendment |
1. Does Ohio's postconviction process allow indigent defendants a substantive opportunity to develop claims that comport with Ohio's collateral review… |
| 19-8847 |
Michael D. Nixon v. United States |
Sixth Circuit |
2020-07-07 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
18-USC-3006A constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process expert-witness funding-denial geo-location indigent-defendant sixth-amendment statutory-interpretation |
Whether Michael D. Nixon's constitutional rights were violated when the District Court failed to grant him, an indigent defendant, funding for a geo-l… |
| 19-8382 |
Christopher Ewing, aka Alex Christopher Ewing v. Nevada |
Nevada |
2020-04-30 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
criminal-procedure due-process extradition extradition-hearing fourteenth-amendment indigent-defendant right-to-counsel sixth-amendment statutory-interpretation |
Whether the Uniform Criminal Extradition Act's guarantee that defendants have the right to "demand and procure counsel" requires state courts to appoi… |
| 19-8300 |
Clark Milton Hyden v. Georgia |
Georgia |
2020-04-20 |
Denied |
Response RequestedRelisted (2)IFP |
barker-framework barker-v-wingo constitutional-rights criminal-appeal criminal-appeals due-process fairness-and-prejudice indigent-counsel indigent-defendant speedy-trial |
Did the delay in Petitioner's first appeal as of right from his criminal conviction violate the Due Process Clause? |
| 19-8305 |
Kinsley Ononuju v. Virginia |
Virginia |
2020-04-19 |
Rehearing |
Relisted (2)IFP |
appeal appellate-review constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process equal-protection indigence indigent-defendant transcript transcript-cost |
On Equal Protection Clause; Whether Supreme Court of Virginia erred in refusing to find any unconstitutionality in VA Code § 19.2-165 that only mandat… |
| 19-8052 |
Mohamed A. Almahmmody v. Tennessee |
Tennessee |
2020-03-20 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
the legal issue being raised appears to be: appeal court-appointed-counsel criminal-appeal criminal-procedure due-process in-forma-pauperis indigency indigent-defendant pro-bono-representation right-to-counsel transcript trial-transcript |
Question not identified. |
| 19-7758 |
Lin Ouyang v. Achem Industry America, Inc. |
California |
2020-02-24 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
14th-amendment appeal civil-procedure civil-rights court-appointed-counsel criminal-appeal criminal-procedure due-process equal-protection equal-protection-clause fourth-amendment indigent-defendant indigent-rights misdemeanor-conviction right-to-counsel |
Whether the state court's dismissal of the appeal from misdemeanor conviction, despite the lack of assistance of counsel on appeal, violates the Equal… |
| 19-7743 |
Robert Paul Langley, Jr. v. Oregon |
Oregon |
2020-02-24 |
Denied |
IFP |
appointment-of-counsel attorney criminal-procedure marion-county-circuit-court oregon-supreme-court state-court-procedure breakdown-in-communication criminal-procedure effective-assistance-of-counsel indigent-defendant right-to-counsel sixth-amendment |
Question not identified. |
| 19-7537 |
Donald Alexander Spice v. Michigan |
Michigan |
2020-02-05 |
Denied |
IFP |
appeal court-access due-process equal-protection fourteenth-amendment indigent-defendant indigent-defendants transcript transcript-access transcripts |
QUESTION I
WHETHER ICR S.433(C) <3) IS UNCONSTTIOTTONAL AS IT VIOLATES THE EQUAL PROTECTION
M© DUE PROCESS CLAUSE OP THE FOURTEENTH AMENDME3ST AND T… |
| 19-871 |
Raheem Chabezz Johnson v. Jeffery Kiser, Warden |
Virginia |
2020-01-15 |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
ake-v-oklahoma due-process indigent-defendant mcwilliams-v-dunn mental-health mental-health-expert sentencing sentencing-phase |
Whether an indigent defendant who seeks the appointment of a mental conditions expert to assist in the sentencing phase of his trial is denied due pro… |
| 19-7093 |
Oscar Ibarra v. Nick Ludwick, Warden |
Eighth Circuit |
2019-12-31 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
conflict-of-interest criminal-procedure indigent-defendant ineffective-assistance murder right-to-counsel sixth-amendment |
I. Does the Sixth Amendment permit an office to represent an indigent defendant in a First Degree Murder case if the office previously represented bot… |
| 19-6555 |
Courtney Johnson v. United States |
Third Circuit |
2019-11-07 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
ability-to-pay appointed-counsel criminal-procedure due-process fine-imposition fines indigent-defendant judicial-discretion sentencing statutory-interpretation |
WHETHER A DISTRICT COURT ERRS BY IMPOSING A FINE UPON AN INDIGENT DEFENDANT, REPRESENTED BY APPOINTED COUNSEL, WITHOUT MAKING ANY INQUIRY INTO THE DEF… |
| 19-6477 |
Charles Russell Rhines v. Darin Young, Warden |
Eighth Circuit |
2019-11-01 |
Denied |
IFP |
18-usc-3599 ayestas-v-davis clemency-request death-penalty exhaustion-requirement expert-services federal-court federal-courts federal-jurisdiction indigent-defendant state-remedies |
In 18 U.S.C. § 3599, Congress created a right for indigent death-sentenced state prisoners to obtain legal and expert services, including services in … |
| 19-6271 |
Gary Patrick Lewis v. Michigan |
Michigan |
2019-10-16 |
Denied |
IFP |
affidavit-of-indigency appointed-counsel arson-conviction criminal-appeal criminal-procedure due-process in-forma-pauperis indigency indigent-defendant michigan-court right-to-counsel state-appellate-defender state-court-appeal |
Question not identified. |
| 19-6259 |
Keino S. Chrichlow v. Dana Metzger, Warden, et al. |
Third Circuit |
2019-10-11 |
Denied |
IFP |
abandonment-of-counsel appellate-procedure appellate-process civil-rights constitutional-rights court-appointed-counsel direct-appeal due-process habeas-corpus indigent-defendant ineffective-assistance right-to-counsel standing |
1. whether or not an indigent defendant is entitled to equitable tolling, where he was in fact denied the right to challenge his sentence and convicti… |
| 19-6213 |
Marcus Bartholomew Booker v. Texas |
Texas |
2019-10-08 |
Denied |
Response RequestedRelisted (2)IFP |
constitutional-rights direct-appeal due-process effective-assistance-of-counsel indigent-defendant ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel post-conviction-habeas post-conviction-habeas-corpus right-to-access state-court-proceedings trial-ineffectiveness trial-records |
Does an indigent defendant have a right to access to a free Clerk's and Reporter's Records in a state post-conviction habeas corpus proceeding when th… |
| 19-5775 |
Richard James Soldan v. Michigan |
Michigan |
2019-09-03 |
Denied |
IFP |
anders-brief anders-procedure appellate-counsel appellate-review court-appointed-counsel criminal-procedure due-process first-tier-review indigent-defendant michigan-court-of-appeals michigan-procedure plea-bargaining right-to-counsel |
MAY THE TRIAL COURT REFUSE TO APPFOINT SUSTITUTE APPELLATE COUNSEL TO AN INDIGENT DEFENDANT CONVICTED ON HIS PLEA WHO SEEKS ACCESS TO FIRST TIER REVIE… |
| 19-5644 |
Keith Stuart Cumbee v. Lorie Davis, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division |
Fifth Circuit |
2019-08-21 |
Denied |
IFP |
criminal-procedure does-judicial-confession double-jeopardy due-process due-process-clause fifth-amendment fourteenth-amendment habeas-corpus indigent-defendant judicial-confession legal-assistance legal-assistance-clause sixth-amendment without-prior-appointment-of-counsel without-waiver |
Despite lower court COA denial, should this Court consider, or remand for consideration, habeas claims: a. Does judicial confession in this case, with… |
| 19-5638 |
Jeffrey E. Lee v. Florida |
Florida |
2019-08-19 |
Denied |
Response RequestedRelisted (2)IFP |
betterman-v-montana constitutional-rights criminal-procedure delay due-process indigent-defendant right-to-counsel sentencing sentencing-delay standard |
I.
IN THE WAKE OF THE QUESTION LEFT OPEN BY
THE COURT IN BETTERMAN v. MONTANA . 136 S.CT.
1609 (2016), DOES THE DUE PROCESS CLAUSE
CREATE AN ENTITL… |
| 18-9843 |
Freddie Lee Fountain v. Texas |
Texas |
2019-06-27 |
Denied |
IFP |
access-to-justice civil-rights constitutional-law constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process habeas-corpus indigent-defendant indigent-defense procedural-protections |
A United States citizen accused of crime upon American soil retained no constitutional rights or procedural protections of any value during the crimin… |
| 18-9623 |
Robert William Wazney v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. |
Fourth Circuit |
2019-06-11 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
14th-amendment appellate-procedure appellate-relief asset-freezing constitutional-rights due-process equal-protection evidence indigent-defendant |
PREFACE: In tFis case Defendant argues tFe Plaintiff refused mortgage payments from Defendants wife tFen came after tFe Defendant for tFe Money. TFe D… |
| 18-9180 |
Cesar Arce-Hernandez v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
2019-05-07 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appeal-waiver criminal-justice-act criminal-procedure garza-v-idaho indigent-defendant ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel plea-agreement plea-bargaining pretrial-proceedings right-to-counsel sixth-amendment |
I. Does a Sixth Amendment claim of ineffectiveness of assistance of counsel during pretrial proceedings survive a general waiver of the right to appea… |
| 18-8818 |
Cornell D. Reynolds v. Randall Hepp, Warden |
Seventh Circuit |
2019-04-15 |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (3)IFP |
appeal appellate-rights appointed-counsel attorney-client attorney-compensation conflict-of-interest due-process indigent-defendant indigent-defense statutory-provisions |
Should the conflict of interest doctrine be extended to include financial conflicts between attorney and client; and/or
Whether a state creates a fat… |
| 18-8506 |
Jose Jaime Lopez v. United States |
Seventh Circuit |
2019-03-21 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
21-usc-846 7th-circuit 7th-circuit-precedent 851-colloquy abuse-of-statute appellate-review attempt-charge attempt-conviction civil-rights criminal-procedure drug-deal due-process indigent indigent-defendant indigent-status prior-conviction reasonable-doubt right-to-counsel seventh-circuit speculation standing substantial-step |
WHETHER PETITIONER WAS DEPRIVED OF THE RIGHT TO COUNSEL BY THE U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT'S FAILURE TO APPOINT COUNSEL AFTER PETITI… |
| 18-8172 |
Corinthian Bostic v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
2019-02-28 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
attorney-withdrawal conflict-of-interest due-process fifth-amendment indigent indigent-defendant ineffective-assistance motion-to-withdraw pre-trial-hearing pre-trial-motion right-to-appeal |
Did the pre-trial judge abuse its discretion by denying Bostic's appointed attorney's motion to withdraw where Bostic and his trial counsel had a conf… |
| 18-6967 |
Michael Danilovich, aka Sealed Defendant 2, aka Mike Daniels, aka Fat Mike, aka Mike D v. United States |
Second Circuit |
2018-12-07 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appointment-of-counsel civil-rights criminal-procedure due-process indigent-defendant legal-representation qualified-reappointment reappointment-of-counsel right-to-counsel sixth-amendment |
The question presented is whether an indigent defendant has a qualified right to reappointment of counsel. |
| 18-6898 |
Joseph C. Garcia v. Lorie Davis, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division |
Fifth Circuit |
2018-12-04 |
Denied |
IFP |
18-u.s.c.-§-3599 18-usc-3599 certificate-of-appealability death-penalty federal-habeas-corpus habeas-corpus indigent-defendant ineffective-assistance-counsel ineffective-assistance-of-counsel rule-60(b)(6) rule-60b |
1. Whether the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit imposed an improper and unduly burdensome Certificate of Appealability (COA) stand… |
| 18-6457 |
Abel Puente v. Julie L. Jones, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
2018-10-26 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
constitutional-rights counsel-of-choice criminal-procedure effective-assistance-of-counsel indigent-defendant retained-attorney right-to-discharge-counsel sixth-amendment |
WHETHER THE SIXTH AMENDMENT RIGHT TO EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL AND TO COUNSEL OF CHOICE, WHICH ALSO PROVIDED THE RIGHT TO DISCHARGE COUNSEL, WIL… |
| 18-5946 |
William A. Parrish, Jr. v. Lyneal Wainwright, Warden |
Sixth Circuit |
2018-09-12 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-rights court-of-appeals due-process effective-assistance-of-counsel grand-jury-selection indigent indigent-defendant indigent-litigant judicial-discretion perjured-testimony pro-se right-to-appeal right-to-counsel self-representation speedy-trial transcript trial-transcript |
Did the State Court of Appeals have the authority to deny a pro se indigent litigant a copy of his trial transcript because he choose to represent him… |
| 18-201 |
Parviz Montazer v. Parvin R. Montazer |
California |
2018-08-15 |
Denied |
|
appellate-counsel appellate-procedure civil-procedure conflict-of-interest constitutional-protections criminal-contempt criminal-procedure due-process indigent-defendant indigent-rights ineffective-assistance-of-counsel judicial-bias right-to-counsel sixth-amendment transcript-costs |
1. Is not an appellate court required to appoint counsel to an indigent in a criminal case? if so, is not an indigent appellant entitled to the cost o… |
| 18-5418 |
Kenneth Green v. Colorado |
Colorado |
2018-07-31 |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
civil-procedure collateral-attack due-process federal-questions fourth-amendment indigent-defendant march-7-2014 motion plea-bargaining right-to-appeal transcript written-motion |
Does state have a constitutional authority in the case of warrantless arrest with no probable cause determination by a neutral and detached magistrate… |